Medication
Helps Alcoholics Control Drinking
Laura Kennedy, Contributing
Writer
Health
Behavior News Service
A little-known drug called Naltrexone provides a “meaningful
benefit” in helping alcoholics moderate their drinking, according
to the latest review of evidence from 29 studies on four continents.
The findings, along with the recent FDA approval of a similar drug
called acamprosate, open the door to new treatment options for drinkers
who aren’t yet ready to face total abstinence.
Naltrexone, which is not addictive, “should
be accepted as a short-term treatment for alcoholism,” say
authors Dr. Manit Srisurapanont and Dr. Ngamwong Jarusuraisin of
Thailand’s Chiang Mai University. Almost all of the studies
tested naltrexone, or NTX, in combination with psychosocial treatments
such as counseling or self-help groups, and the authors recommend
using this approach in everyday practice.
The review’s conclusions are based on “high-quality
evidence” that naltrexone reduces by 36 percent the risk of
an alcoholic relapsing to heavy drinking in the first three months
of recovery. “Short-term treatment of NTX for alcoholism gives
a meaningful benefit in preventing a relapse,” the review
said, citing an 18 percent lower likelihood that patients will abandon
their treatment program.
The review appears in the most recent issue of
The Cochrane Library, a publication of The Cochrane Collaboration,
an international organization that evaluates medical research. Systematic
reviews draw evidence-based conclusions about medical practice after
considering both the content and quality of existing medical trials
on a topic.
Dr. Joseph Volpicelli, of the University of Pennsylvania
School of Medicine, has been conducting research on naltrexone use
for alcohol dependence since the early 1980s. Naltrexone blocks
the brain’s receptors for natural painkillers, known as opioids,
which normally create the feeling of wellbeing associated with drinking.
He explains that the benefits of naltrexone lie
not so much in preventing a patient from having one drink, but rather
in breaking the cycle where one drink leads to many more. “Naltrexone
helps people have more control over the use of alcohol. For me,
that’s the fundamental issue of what addiction is: impaired
control.”
However, this approach requires a substantial
change from the abstinence-only philosophy that goes back at least
as far as Prohibition. Naltrexone is most effective, says Volpicelli,
in a treatment program “designed to support the notion that
while one drink is not great, what you really want to stop is excessive
drinking.”
While few professionals advise people with alcoholism
to abandon the ultimate goal of total abstinence, Volpicelli argues
that about 20 million Americans suffer from alcohol abuse disorders,
yet only about 2 million are in any kind of treatment program. “We
should be flexible enough to get at that 90 percent of people who
aren’t in treatment,” he says.
The U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration agrees in its naltrexone treatment protocol, saying,
“Abstinence should be a desired goal for the patient; however,
reductions in drinking may be an acceptable intermediate outcome
… because there are many other areas of a patient’s
life that can improve, such as job performance, social relationships,
and general physical health.”
Although naltrexone (ReVia) has been available
for more than 10 years, Volpicelli says it has been poorly marketed,
and most patients and primary care doctors remain unaware of its
potential. That may change now that the manufacturer of acamprosate
(Campral) has embarked on a campaign to promote pharmacological
treatment of alcohol addiction.
Review author Srisurapanont notes that the availability
of both medicines now gives patients an alternative if one is not
effective for them. And, he adds, the possible benefits of using
the medications in combination should be studied. The review also
notes that other areas ripe for future study include the possible
benefit of continuing naltrexone treatment beyond the first three
months of recovery and strategies to further increase treatment
completion.
Volpicelli believes psychiatry is on the brink
of recognizing a new standard of care for alcohol abuse disorders:
allowing patients to choose from a variety of treatments, which
may or many not focus on total abstinence. It is, he believes, a
time of great hope. To those who suffer with alcoholism, he says,
“Be aware of all the options available and find the best one
for you. See someone, stay in treatment, and over time you’re
going to get better.”
1. Srisurapanont
M, Jarusuraisin N. Opioid Antagonists for Alcohol Dependence (Review).
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1
Finding
Effective Treatment for Alcohol Dependence
By Lloyd Vacovsky
Executive Director, American Council
on Alcoholism
and Director of Assisted
Recovery Centers of America
Finding effective treatment for alcoholism is a daunting task faced
by alcohol dependent individuals and their loved ones. Adding to
the confusion is the fact that treatment for alcohol dependence
is currently a very controversial subject. For example, the debate
continues as to whether or not alcoholism is a “disease”,
and what is the most appropriate treatment. Individuals seeking
treatment are confronted with the reality that outside of the traditional
12 Step or Minnesota Model programs, there are few alternatives
currently available. Human beings are a diverse group of creatures,
with unique needs, especially in terms of treatment for alcohol
dependence and substance abuse. In general there are three basic
camps or treatment approaches.
The approach embraced by the vast majority of
treatment providers is the Minnesota Model. This is your basic12-Step
type of program and was developed at the Hazeldon Institute in Minnesota.
This model accepts alcoholism as a disease, but defines the disease
as being spiritual in nature. It relies heavily on establishing
(or re-establishing) spiritual values and reaching an accommodation
with a “higher power”. The primary treatment tool is
the group meeting. It must be noted that Alcoholics Anonymous does
not consider itself a “treatment program”, but rather
a group of individuals bound together by a common issue, alcohol
dependence. The vast majority of treatment programs incorporate
the 12-Steps as an integral part of their treatment.
The second approach to treatment regards alcoholism
as a “learned behavior” rather than as a disease. As
such, the focus of treatment utilizes what is known as cognitive
restructuring, or cognitive behavioral therapy. Simply stated this
means assisting the alcohol dependent individual to assess the various
components of their life, and to work on those behaviors, which
have been impacted by alcohol consumption. This is the approach
often utilized by independent treatment professionals and is usually
provided in a more intimate one on one setting. Albert Ellis of
the Ellis Institute of New York City is widely considered the founding
father of cognitive behavioral therapy.
Finally, there are those who point to the increasing
body of evidence that indicates that alcoholism is indeed a disease,
albeit a very complicated disease with distinct Biological, Psychological
and Social components.
This group believes that treatment should be more broad-based and
include such new developments as pharmacotherapy. They embrace the
use of effective medications, for example Naltrexone as an important
component of the treatment processes. The use of medications addresses
the Biological component of the recovery process. In addition, it
relies heavily upon counseling that utilizes Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy to address the Psychological and Social components of recovery.
This position is becoming known as the Pennsylvania Model of Recovery.
The Pennsylvania Model does not require a spiritual epiphany or
the acceptance of a Higher Power for recovery.
Pennsylvania Model protocols are largely based
on the research and work of the University of Pennsylvania School
of Medicine, Treatment Research Center, in Philadelphia, and in
particular Dr. Joseph R.Volpicelli, M.D., Ph.D., also of the University
of Pennsylvania. These protocols fully integrate pharmacological
and psychosocial support in the recovery process. This type of integrated
program is distinguished from other protocols, which generally reject
the use of pharmacological agents as an aid in the recovery process.
The Pennsylvania Model is a medical model, in
which a full range of empirically tested treatment options are offered
to individuals who are dependent upon alcohol. The University of
Pennsylvania has a 20-year history of clinical studies, which has
led to the development of these protocols. The medical and scientific
community has recognized the research of the University of Pennsylvania
for developing important advances in the treatment of alcohol and
drug dependence. For example, the University pioneered the use of
the pharmacological agent Naltrexone HCI, which suppresses the craving
to consume alcohol or opiates, and dramatically reduces relapse.
(Archives of General Psychiatry, 49:876-880, 1992 Volpicelli etc.)
The vast majority of treatment providers in the
United States incorporate the protocols of the Minnesota Model,
which again has as its cornerstone the acceptance of a higher power
before recovery can be achieved. This is the model that has been
used to train treatment professionals for decades. As a result,
the Minnesota Model has been accepted almost without question as
the only effective treatment option. It is a very rigid method that
does not allow individuals to stray far from established procedures.
For example, individuals must work each of the twelve steps in order,
and secure a “sponsor” or advisor. The utilization of
any treatment technique, other than what is proscribed in the Big
Book of AA is frowned upon.
While the use of medications is not specifically
discouraged, neither is it encouraged. For many years, even the
use of Physician prescribed anti-depressants was actively discouraged
by most well meaning AA groups. The bias against the use of any
medication that alters mood or the need to consume alcohol is clearly
part of the AA mantra. This is largely due to the fact that many
medications (especially psychotropic medications) are not understood
by the general public, and in turn, by members of the AA community.
As a result, this continuing bias against the use of appropriate
medications has resulted in disastrous consequences for countless
individuals.
While this bias against the use of safe, effective
medications to assist in the recovery process has dramatically reduced
their utilization. The primary culprit appears to be the lack of
understanding among treatment professionals and physicians, as to
the proper use of approved medications. The majority have very little
experience with pharmacotherapy for the treatment of alcohol dependence.
While many are generally receptive to the concept of pharmacotherapy,
most have never heard of the most promising medication for the treatment
of alcohol dependence, Naltrexone, ten years after its approval
by the United States Food & Drug Administration.
The FDA first approved naltrexone in 1984 under
the brand name Trexan for the treatment of opiate abuse. In 1994,
the FDA extended its use to include alcohol dependence and was marketed
by DuPont Pharma under the brand name ReVia. Since December 1997,
it has been available as a generic.
While there was some initial enthusiasm for Naltrexone,
most treatment providers became easily discouraged, because it did
not produce immediate and positive results for all their patients.
At best they reported “spotty” results. The Naltrexone
seemed to work well with one individual, while being seemingly ineffective
with another. We now believe that many individuals received inadequate
dosage and inappropriate time of dosage, for their unique metabolism
and life patterns, and in turn reported the medication ineffective.
There are numerous additional factors affecting the effectiveness
of Naltrexone, for example age and gender. In addition, the presence
of pre-existing conditions such as clinical depression probably
must be addressed with appropriate anti-depression medication. Other
factors include social, relationship, legal, and employment issues,
which can all directly impact the recovery process. Cognitive behavioral
therapy has been shown to be very effective in helping individuals
to address the numerous, recovery complex issues that they face.
Mental health professionals have long understood
the need to adjust the dosage of medications prescribed for their
patients. Each individual is unique, and reacts to medications uniquely.
Alcohol treatment professionals who utilized Naltrexone rarely ventured
outside of the Physicians Desk Reference’s (PDR) recommended
guidelines. For example the PDR recommends that Naltrexone be taken
in the morning. The thought behind this recommendation was that
it would improve medication compliance by getting an individual
in the habit of taking the Naltrexone first thing each morning.
The reality is that very few people drink first thing in the morning.
They need the full effect of the medication much later in the afternoon
as the thought process turns to going home and “relaxing”
with “a” drink.
It is increasingly clear that issues such as
dosage and length of treatment can vary greatly from individual
to individual, and what may be appropriate for a man, is not necessarily
so for a woman. A recent article published in THE SCIENTIST 16(6):
29: March 18, 2002 entitled THE INEQUALITY OF DRUG METABOLISM describes
how the same medication and dosage often have different outcomes
for men and women. Our experience has shown that a 50 mg dose of
Naltrexone, when combined with therapy is usually effective for
older males (40 and over), and usually ineffective, even with therapy
for older females (40 and over). We have found that the most effective
dose for most females is a minimum of 100 mg per day or even higher.
It is interesting to note that much of the initial research on Naltrexone
was conducted at Veterans Administration facilities, whose subjects
were mostly older males.
What most treatment professionals do not seem
to comprehend is that Naltrexone is an extremely effective tool,
when appropriately utilized, and that it is not a cure. The purpose
of Naltrexone is to suppress the intense craving to consume alcohol,
generated by alcohol compromised brain chemistry. It is not meant
to solve, for example, the legal or relationship issues which are
often the result of alcohol induced behavior.
The fact of the matter is that Naltrexone will
dramatically affect alcohol consumption. In effect, it forces individuals
to face life, on life’s terms. It forces them to deal with
the consequences of their actions. Indeed, the most difficult aspect
of recovery is learning how to be happy without alcohol. Most alcohol
dependent individuals are not well equipped to make the successful
transition to sobriety. Even though the actual physical craving
to consume alcohol has been suppressed by the Naltrexone, the need
to return to drinking often overwhelms them. They have become dependent
upon the alcohol to deal with all their problems. Unless they start
to successfully address these problems, they will almost certainly
begin drinking again. When this occurs, it is simple to blame the
Naltrexone for “not working”. Naltrexone does not replace
treatment or counseling. Its primary purpose is to create an environment
in which an alcohol dependent individual is able to begin to make
progress in his or her recovery.
When a human being consumes alcohol, it sets
off a chemical chain reaction within the brain that results in the
release of a group of chemicals, most notably, endorphins. Endorphins
assist people in dealing with stress, anxiety, self-esteem and so
forth. When consumed, alcohol travels through the stomach wall into
the blood system, which transports it to the brain. There, it attaches
to opioid receptor sites. (Receptor sites in the brain can be compared
to a message center, which receive and forward commands in response
to stimuli.) The stimulated opioid receptor immediately sends a
command to the opioid endogenous system located within the pleasure
center of the brain, releasing a cascade of endorphins into the
system. It is the release of the endorphins that generates the euphoria
or sense of well being associated with alcohol consumption.
Current research also points to a genetic link,
which can predispose an individual to becoming alcohol dependent.
One theory is that most individuals whom become alcohol dependent
have a low threshold for the release of endorphins as stimulated
by alcohol consumption. When an individual with this predisposition
consumes alcohol, they experience an intense feeling of euphoria
that the “social drinker” does not. As an individual
continues to drink alcohol over a long period of time, the brain
acclimates to the artificial stimulation of the alcohol. It is thought
that in this process the brain slows down, or actually shuts down
the normal production and release of endorphins. At this point the
individual crosses the proverbial Rubicon, or the point of no return,
when their brain becomes dependent upon alcohol to feel emotionally
normal or well. It should be noted that alcohol dependent individuals
at this stage are not drinking to feel good, but rather so that
they do not feel bad.
Historically, when an individual slipped or relapsed,
the blame was placed squarely on the shoulder of that individual.
It is clear that treatment providers must now also begin to accept
some of the “blame”. Treatment should include the latest
scientific advances and should be tailored to the individual’s
unique requirements. Reliance on outdated and ineffective treatment
methods has created an environment that fully expects individuals
to fail, and fail again until such time that rock bottom has been
reached. It is often said that once an individual has reached rock
bottom that there is only one way to go, UP. The problem with that
philosophy is that for many people, the ultimate rock bottom is
death.
Many, (if not indeed most) alcohol dependent
individuals have lost faith in themselves, and more importantly
hope for the future. It is common for such individuals to have numerous
attempts at sobriety, most often using 12-Step methods. They have
been programmed to accept themselves as hopeless and powerless,
with their chance for recovery being slim to none. It is important
to recognize that alcohol dependent individuals do have control
over their lives and that there is appropriate help for them to
be found in the treatment community. It is up to the individual
to determine what is the most appropriate treatment. It is up to
the treatment community to provide options that set up individuals
to succeed, rather than be expected to fail.
New
Medications Help Addicts Battle
Drugs and Alcohol
By
DEBORAH L. SHELTON
Of
the Post-Dispatch
07/31/2005
At his lowest point, Steve Duffie was popping
pills and shooting heroin up to 10 times a day. Then he started
taking a drug to stop.
Since February, he has been traveling three times
a week from his home in Arnold to south St. Louis, where a staff
person at Assisted
Recovery Centers of America watches him swallow pills containing
naltrexone.
"I feel a lot better," said Duffie,
24, who has stayed drug-free. "I feel better about myself and
the life I'm living now."
Naltrexone has been around for 20 years, but
few people know about it.
Experts say a major shift in thinking about how alcohol and drugs
affect the brain is producing more and better medications to treat
addiction to drugs and alcohol.
"Based upon an accumulation of research
findings, our ideas about what alcohol dependence is, when it starts
and how to treat it are changing rapidly," Dr. Mark Willenbring
of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism told a
recent American Medical Association briefing. "New tools are
becoming available, and treatment outcomes, while perhaps better
than most people think, are likely to significantly improve in the
next decade if we can get these treatments to the people who need
them."
Research into medications to treat addiction
has taken off.
Twelve years ago, the federal government was
funding just a half-dozen clinical trials of drugs for alcoholism,
and no pharmaceutical company was conducting research. Today, the
government is financing studies of 51 drugs, and nine companies
are doing clinical trials.
Like antidepressant medication, some of the newer
drugs are designed to repair chemical unbalances and abnormalities
in the brain that occur as a result of chronic drug abuse, Willenbring
said.
Promising medications include brand-new drugs
and those already approved for other purposes. Among them:
Topiramate - approved to treat epilepsy - for
alcoholism and cocaine addiction.
Baclofen - approved for muscle tightness, cramping
and spasms - for alcoholism.
Ondansetron -to treat nausea and vomiting - for
alcoholism.
Nalmefene - approved in 1994 for alcoholism -
is being developed as a six-month implant for both alcoholism and
opiate addiction.
Federal health officials held a forum Friday
at St. Louis University, part of a four-city stop, to raise awareness
among doctors and the public about one medication, buprenorphine.
Marketed under the trade names Suboxone and Subutex, it went on
the market in 2003 to treat heroin, prescription painkiller and
other opiate addictions.
Like naltrexone, it can be prescribed by physicians
in private practice, so "hopefully it will allow addiction
treatment to be incorporated into mainstream medical practice,"
said Nick Reuter, senior public health advisor at the U.S. Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Finding new medications for alcoholism has been
challenging because different regions of the brain are involved.
That complexity also "opens up many strategies for treatment,"
said Dr. Raye Litten, associate director of the division of clinical
and recovery research at National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism.
Naltrexone was approved by the FDA in 1984 to
treat opiate addiction, and in 1994 to treat alcoholism. It also
is being studied for use in combination with acamprosate, the latest
anti-addiction drug to gain FDA clearance. Sold under the trade
name Campral, acamprosate went on the market in January.
An injectable form of naltrexone, Vivitrex, is
currently undergoing review by the FDA as a monthly shot.
Down the road, people might take two or three
medications that act on specific parts of the brain, experts say.
The drug combinations would work much like those designed for people
with AIDS, cancer, diabetes, depression, heart disease and high
blood pressure.
"Just getting them out on the market would
give patients a menu of medications to choose from," Litten
said. "Like antidepressants, if one doesn't work, you could
try another one."
Researchers are learning that many alcoholics
and drug addicts need ongoing or intermittent care much like people
with other chronic conditions. "Treatment should not be a one-time
thing," said Willenbring, a psychiatrist who directs the division
of treatment and recovery research at the federal health agency.
Treatment professionals caution that a commitment
to abstinence is essential.
"You can't put this into somebody's coffee
every day and expect them to be transformed," said Barbara
Mason, a consultant to Forest Laboratories Inc., the company that
makes Campral. "It's another tool in the toolbox of recovery."
Yet, for all the excitement about pharmaceutical
treatments, naltrexone and acamprosate are largely going unused.
Taking away the high
Only about 5 percent of people dependent on alcohol
have ever been prescribed medication, Willenbring said.
Fewer than 3 percent of the nation's 1.1 million
opiate addicts have tried naltrexone, even though it's been around
for 20 years.
The reasons vary - from low awareness of the
medications to lack of drug coverage and a bias against taking a
drug to beat an addiction.
"Most people think addicts just need to
learn how to change their behavior," said Dr. David Gastfriend,
an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.
"That's like fighting this disease with one hand tied behind
your back."
Naltrexone works by occupying the opiate receptors
in the brain. As a result, the feel-good chemicals triggered by
alcohol and opiate drugs are blocked, eliminating the high. The
brain chemicals are endorphin, dopamine, serotonin and gamma-amino
butyric acid, or GABA. The active ingredient of naltrexone is made
in St. Louis by Tyco Healthcare/Mallinckrodt, the biggest U.S. manufacturer
of the drug.
Studies have found that people who are genetically
predisposed to addiction have lower levels of endorphin in their
brains but experience an excessive release of the chemicals when
they drink or do drugs, well beyond what the average person experiences.
Repeated heavy drinkers and drug users build up a tolerance and
require more and more to get high.
Eventually, alcohol or drugs are taken to relieve
the unpleasant effects of not using, such as irritability, anxiety
and craving. "You're drinking to feel normal," said Barbara
Mason, co-director of the Pearson Center for Alcoholism and Addiction
Research at the Scripps Research Institute in California.
Since naltrexone blocks the release of endorphins,
if an alcoholic drinks, speech might become slurred or walking might
get wobbly, but there's no buzz. If the person relapses on the medication,
he or she is more likely to stop after two or three drinks because
the reward of feeling good has been taken away.
After using naltrexone for several months, some
alcoholics are able to abstain from alcohol forever. Some treatment
professionals describe the drug as a "chemical chastity belt."
Acute withdrawal from alcohol and drugs can last
up to seven days. Alcoholics and addicts typically go through a
protracted withdrawal that lasts up to 30 weeks, which can include
overwhelming feelings of craving, said Percy Menzies, a pharmacist
who is president of Assisted Recovery Centers of America.
Naltrexone acts like a "helmet on the brain
that protects you if you fall," Menzies said.
No magic bullets
About 22 million people abuse or are addicted
to drugs, according to government statistics. That figure includes
alcohol and prescription drugs.
"We have a serious drug abuse problem in
this country, including with alcohol, even if we don't recognize
it," said Dan Duncan, director of community services at the
National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, St. Louis area. "We
have a lot of stereotyping going on, people want to think it's an
inner-city problem. That's not true. Go to West County. They're
doing drugs and have the means and resources to buy whatever they
want. It costs all of us and we're affected directly or indirectly
by this problem."
Alcoholism is a disease of behavior, spirit and
the brain, Mason said. "There are therapies that deal with
each aspect of the disease. AA is a spiritually-based fellowship.
There are alcohol-specific types of counseling. But the brain has
been largely ignored in recovery. Campral is the very first drug
that addresses the underlying brain aspect of the disease and helps
to restore that piece to normal."
Naltrexone doesn't repair anything in the brain,
it keeps people from getting high and eases withdrawal. Campral,
or acamprosate, works differently.
Alcohol overstimulates the glutamate system,
causing it to react like a car that's idling too fast, Mason said.
The abnormality can continue as long as a year after the last drink
in some alcoholics. Acamprosate regulates the chemical activity
in the glutamate region.
Campral is shipped to pharmacies across the country
from Forest Laboratories' national distribution center in St. Louis.
Other drugs used to treat addiction are methadone
and disulfiram. Methadone is an opiate given in small doses to prevent
the effects of withdrawal from drugs such as heroin. The narcotic
is designed to block the high and reduce craving. Disulfiram, which
is sold under the trade name Antabuse, has been used to treat alcoholism
since 1949. Drinking while on the drug makes a person violently
ill with nausea, vomiting, heart palpitations and other symptoms.
The aim of researchers is to design newer drugs
that don't make people sick and are not habit-forming or mood-altering.
The side-effects of naltrexone and acamprosate are generally mild,
if any. They are not addictive and don't produce a high. The drugs
usually are prescribed from three months to a year.
Research on naltrexone, disulfiram and acamprosate
is uncovering other benefits.
It appears that disulfiram helps cocaine addicts.
People with a family history of alcoholism appear to do better on
naltrexone. And while acamprosate doesn't appear to have a gender
effect, one study on the naltrexone monthly shot reported that it
seemed to work better in men.
Counseling is critical
Jim Selby keeps a bottle of naltrexone on the
kitchen counter as an insurance policy.
A leg injury led to his five-year prescription
drug habit. "Before I knew it I was taking it all the time,"
said Selby, 47, of south St. Louis County. "That's the way
I was getting by. They had complete control over my life."
He credits his turnaround to his mother, Patricia
Selby, who worked many years for the Al-Anon Information Center
in St. Louis. She directed him to Assisted Recovery Centers of America.
He has been drug-free for two years.
Menzies often keeps the pills of patients who
haven't been abstinent as long as Selby at his clinic so he can
monitor whether they are taking them. Patients are advised to attend
frequent group therapy sessions and to phone regularly.
"The more contact, the better the outcome,"
Menzies said.
Dr. Robert Swift is a professor of psychiatry
and human behavior at Brown University. "The medications that
we have are effective but not as effective as we would like them
to be," he said. "Not all people are helped, and the cure
rate is not 100 percent. These medications need to be used in the
context of counseling and psychosocial treatment."
Addiction impairs motivation, so getting people
to take their pills every day can be a formidable task, said Gastfriend,
who's vice president of medical affairs at Alkermes Inc., the company
seeking approval of the monthly shot.
Vivitrex could make it easier to stay on the
medication.
"By extending the action for 30 days, if
they come in one day for medication, they don't have to be motivated
to come in the other 29 days," Gastfriend said.
Buprenorphine is used as a replacement drug for
heroin, painkillers and other opiates. Subutex is the pure form.
Suboxone is a combination tablet of buprenorphine and naloxone.
Naloxone was added to prevent addicts from grinding and injecting
the tablets to get high.
The benefit of buprenorphine is that it may be
easier to quit than street drugs or prescription medicines.
In a phone interview, Dr. Clifford Bernstein,
a Beverly Hills addiction specialist, says he has seen an increase
in the number of people who've become addicted to it. An informational
booklet from the manufacturer warns that patients can become physically
dependent.
"Patients need to be educated that it's
a replacement therapy which is half opiate in composition,"
Bernstein said.
But at the St. Louis University forum, Theodore
Cicero said research at Washington University suggests that buprenorphine
is a safe alternative that has less potential for abuse than opiates.
Cicero is vice chancellor for research at the university.
Steve Duffie was prescribed Suboxone for two
weeks. Then he was switched to naltrexone. His mother, Cathy Duffie,
is convinced he would have died without the medications.
"It's amazing what addiction can do to you," she said,
glancing at the son she never gave up on. "It's a horrible
life." |
|
for
more info on Pharmaceutical treatment:
Ondanestron
for Reduction of Drinking
Ondanestron-Journal
of the American Medical Association
Glaxon-Wellcome
- manufacturer Zofran
Drug
Abuse Sciences
Biotek -
Depotrex
Nalmefene
NALTREXONE and TIP
28 is a publication of the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment,
Substance abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, of the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. TIP 28 is available
in print from by calling NCADI at 1-800-729-6686. A free copy will
be mailed within a few days. Ask for DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 98-3206.
TIP 28 is also available for viewing or for download via the Internet
web site:
http://www.health.org/govpubs/BKD268/
A newer, more streamlined version of TIP 28 called the Physician's
Guide is also now available. Ask for DHHS Publication No. (SMA)
00-3397. Because this new version of TIP 28 is not yet available
from the SAMHSA web site, we have reprinted page 17 at the above
link, in case you'd like to print it out to take along with you
when you see your Doctor.
Why is recovery from Alcoholism so difficult?
And is there hope for successful treatment?
by Percy Menzies
Director, Assisted Recovery
Centers of Missouri
We hardly need to repeat the statistics on alcoholism,
in terms of deaths and injuries due to accidents, hospitalizations,
broken families, lost productivity, etc. Indeed, alcoholism (or
alcohol dependence) is one of the major public health issues facing
our nation.
It would seem logical that with all the advances
we have made in the various fields of medical science, that by now,
we should have been able to subdue this beast of alcoholism. Unfortunately,
we have barely made a dent in the battle against alcoholism, which
costs the nation hundreds of billions of dollars a year.
Millions of dollars are spent each year in researching
just about every aspect of alcoholism – from genetics, to
blocking the effects of alcohol. Some of the research is very exciting
and has certainly advanced our understanding of this devastating
disease, and we expect many more equally exciting findings to come
in the near future.
A succinct definition of alcoholism (and for
that matter, all addiction) is: it is a disorder of the pleasure
system of the brain. The ‘pleasure’ system is vital
to the survival of the species. If we did not experience pleasure,
there would be little incentive to seek water, food, shelter, or
reproduce. These functions are called drive states. The body has
a finely tuned mechanism to trigger and satiate these instinctive
drives. The actual sensation of pleasure occurs when certain biochemicals
called ‘neurotransmitters’ are released in anticipation
of these drives. These neurotransmitters travel to specific sites
in the brain and stimulate very specific clusters of brain cells
(or neurons) called ‘receptors’. There are specific
receptors for each neurotransmitter – analogous to a lock
and key mechanism. When the receptors are stimulated, pleasure is
experienced. A major focus of scientific research is to unlock the
mystery of the pleasure system and the complex interactions between
neurotransmitters and receptor sites.
There are certain substances found in nature
that either mimic the actions of the body’s neurotransmitters
or excessively stimulate the pleasure system. Morphine, heroin,
and other similar drugs either extracted or produced from opium,
mimic the actions of one of the most powerful pleasure producing
neurotransmitters, called ‘endorphins’. Endorphins,
in addition to producing pleasure, protect the person from pain.
This is the reason morphine and morphine-like drugs are used as
potent painkillers, or analgesics. The effects of alcohol are more
complex. Alcohol affects several neurotransmitters, either by stimulating
or depressing the release of these neurotransmitters.
Unfortunately, the ingestion of alcohol and certain
addicting drugs cause levels of pleasure far more than the body
needs. But all human beings are not affected to the same extent
by this abnormal pleasure. About 10-15% of the population has a
genetic predisposition (or tendency) to experience the pleasure
from addicting substances and alcohol in an abnormally exaggerated
fashion. The body’s response: “I like it, give me more
and give it to me now!” Such people are more vulnerable to
addictions and alcoholism. By no means are these people destined
to become alcoholics or addicts. There are other factors-- like
the unpleasant effects of a severe headache or drowsiness-- that
will make these people turn away from alcohol. The genetic predisposition
is more of a warning sign than fate or destiny.
Psychological and psychiatric factors-- like
depression, stress, and mental illness-- may lead people to abuse
addictive substances. Another important factor is the social environment.
If there is drinking in the family or the friends are into alcohol
or drugs, this can become an important contributing factor in reinforcing
the disease… and later, a major obstacle to successful treatment.
How does the brain react to these surges of abnormal
pleasure? The receptors attempt to accommodate (or adapt to) these
bigger and more frequent jolts, through a mechanism called ‘neuroadaptation’.
The neurons are no longer satisfied with what they experienced previously;
they now want more of it, and more often. Unfortunately, the pleasure
experienced the first time cannot be experienced again, and the
futile quest leads to a downward spiral. Most alcoholics and addicts
are beyond the pleasure stage. They drink or use drugs to lessen
the pain or feel ‘less bad’. Neuroadaptation leads to
intense cravings, physical dependence, loss of control and tolerance.
Things get worse as the disease progresses. The
addiction gets embedded into the neurological circuitry of the memory,
emotion and motivation, and becomes part of the drive state so essential
to the preservation of life (i.e. food, shelter, sex etc.). The
addiction (as evidenced by cravings) can be so overpowering that
it often supersedes the normal human instinct to seek food, shelter,
safety etc. Seeking drugs or alcohol now becomes the overwhelming,
and often the only objective of these patients… with complete
disregard to health, safety and personal well-being.
To add insult to injury, when patients wake up to the stark reality
of the dire situation, and seek help (either voluntarily or through
the intervention of family), there are no easy ‘road maps’
to follow. They are drowned by the misinformation present everywhere.
Society has little or no sympathy for these patients. “They
did it to themselves, so let them suffer!” Is addiction or
alcoholism a disease, a crime or a vice? There is no dearth of opinions
on the causes and treatment of this most misunderstood disease.
“Throw the bums into jail!”, cry the law and order folks…
and “Give yourself to a higher power...” intone the
folks on the moral front.
Why is this disease so difficult to treat? What
is the best treatment for alcoholism and addictions? Is a medical
approach better than behavioral approach? Is one treatment better
than another? Why does this disease have such a high failure rate?
The answers are not easy, and often as complex as the disease itself.
It is generally accepted that alcoholism is a
chronic disease, yet the treatment is often non-medical, episodic
and based on folklore and personal experiences. The history of this
disease is a chronicle of change and resistance to change. Rarely
has the treatment of a disease been so mired in rigid belief systems…
with little interest in incorporating proven therapies and scientific
advances.
A successful treatment approach must take into
consideration the very nature of the disease. Compulsive and uncontrolled
drug or alcohol use is part of the disease, and is driven by both
cravings and urges. The urges are probably going to remain with
the patients for the rest of their lives. Fortunately, behavior
modification (through counseling) can teach these patients skills
to control these urges. We have to accept the fact that alcoholism
and addictions-- like other chronic diseases such as diabetes or
hypertension-- can only be controlled, and not cured. Does this
mean that the patients are destined to suffer through cycles of
abstinence and relapses to drug and alcohol use? Not necessarily,
but this is an ever present danger. Why is this? We have to again
go back to the neurobiology of the brain.
The pleasure center of the brain is co-located
with memory, emotional and motivational centers, and they are inter-connected.
The memory has an incredible ability to retrieve things –
both good and bad. Patients who have been abstinent for long periods
of time can compulsively use drugs or alcohol within minutes of
being exposed to sights, sounds, smells, etc. of past drug and alcohol
use. Before treatment, the patients’ addiction and alcoholism
was reinforced through ‘conditioned stimuli’…
visiting bars; liquor in the house; friends drinking, etc. The ‘conditioned
abstinence’ brought on by incarceration or inpatient programs
can create the illusion of abstinence, but can quickly lead to relapses
when patients are exposed to external environmental cues. For successful
treatment, both the conditioned stimuli and conditioned abstinence
should be extinguished. How can this be achieved?
A good treatment program should address craving
– the most persistent and intractable symptom of the disease.
Craving is implicated in both reinforcing the disease and in relapses.
External or internal stimuli trigger thoughts to use drugs or alcohol.
The brain responds by releasing endorphins (the pleasure neurotransmitter),
which in turn will bind to the opioid receptors and trigger the
sensation of pleasure. This unleashes the desire for more, and the
patients often succumb to this craving, resulting in the patient
relapsing to drugs or alcohol.
Since craving is a neuro-chemical reaction, it
is best treated with medications. Indeed, the most tangible results
of recent research and clinical studies have resulted in medications
to attenuate craving. We have achieved varying degrees of success
in this approach - nicotine patches for cigarette addiction; methadone
for heroin addiction; naltrexone for alcoholism. Several very promising
medications, all addressing cravings, are undergoing clinical studies.
The effect of addiction on the person (behavior)
must be addressed, and is best addressed through various forms of
individual or group counseling. The critical areas include: controlling
thoughts (urges) that lead to drugs or alcohol use, stress and anger
management, life style changes to modify alcohol-related behaviors,
etc. Numerous studies have consistently shown that a combination
of medications with behavioral therapies has the best results in
long-term relapse prevention. Reducing the craving makes counseling
far more effective-- with improved long-term success.
Why are these proven medications not used more
extensively? Sadly, there exists a chasm in research and clinical
practice of addiction and alcoholism treatment. Medical advances
that have been proven safe and effective over a long period of time
are often rejected, or poorly incorporated into the treatment regimen,
resulting in failures… which provide a strong disincentive
to develop better and more effective therapies.
The future for the successful treatment of alcoholism
lies first in destigmatizing the disease, and secondly, in combining
the effective medications presently available along with behavioral
(or cognitive) therapy. The treatment must be delivered in a structured
program to minimize the ambivalence commonly seen in alcoholism
and addictions.
Only then we can give a new meaning to the slogan:
TREATMENT WORKS.
Percy Menzies, Director
Assisted Recovery Centers of America-St. Louis, MO
Lansdowne Medical Building
6651 Chippewa, Suite # 224
St. Louis, MO, 63109
Tel. 314-645-6840
Email: percymenzies@arcamidwest.com
INTERESTING REFERENCES AND BOOKS
1. William L. White, Slaying the Dragon. Chestnut Health Systems
Publication
2. Lonny Shavelson, Hooked: Misguided Drug Rehab
System. The New Press, NY
3. Joseph Volpicelli and Maia Szalzvitz, Recovery
Options. John Wiley and Sons, Inc
4. TIP 28, Naltrexone and Alcoholism Treatment.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
|